2013/7/24 Lee Spector <lspec...@hampshire.edu>:

> I don't really see why it's helpful to anyone to make me and other :use users 
> do this.

Lee, you were in the past really brilliant at showing me whre I
couldn't see, anymore, how difficult to grasp some Counterclockwise
features were.
This is what is called "curse of knowledge", I guess.

Having both :use and :require :refer :all falls under this definition,
I guess. You (and to some extent me) can easily play with both forms.
But why both forms ? That's curse of knowledge in action, because this
will make no sense at all for newcomers, and there's no good reason
for having both, except historical ones.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to