On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Gary Trakhman wrote: > > For instance, we have defrecords now, no one's going to reach for defstruct > because records are documented and promoted more thoroughly.
FWIW I'm even a contrarian on defstruct :-! although I've switched to records anyway on account of speed. On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > > Because use = require + refer (essentially). Is using :refer :all semantically identical to using :use? Or does "essentially" have a gap here? If it's identical then I guess I don't care much either way, although I'd prefer to stick with the shorter thing that's already in my code. -Lee -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
