On Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:29:57 AM UTC-7, Shantanu Kumar wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 9 October 2012 06:07:06 UTC+5:30, Jason Wolfe wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:27:15 PM UTC-7, Shantanu Kumar wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Monday, 8 October 2012 04:57:06 UTC+5:30, Stuart Sierra wrote: >>>> >>>> From the look of the source, there's no reason why ->> couldn't have >>>> arity-1. I guess it just doesn't come up much. >>>> >>> >>> Arity-1 for ->> would be useful to let somebody comment out forms as >>> follows: >>> >>> (->> foo >>> #_(bar baz) >>> #_quux) >>> >>> I can file an issue on JIRA if this makes sense. >>> >> >> >> +1 I've hit this issue before when generating a macroexpansion with ->> >> in it. >> >> Also, I think at some point -> and ->> weren't themselves properly >> namespaced in their own macroexpansions, not sure if it's still an issue >> but maybe worth checking while you're in there. >> > > Jason, do you have a snippet to reproduce the error you described? >
Now that I think about it, I believe the namespace issue was in -?> and -?>> from an old contrib library. Sorry for the noise. > > Shantanu > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
