On Monday, 8 October 2012 04:57:06 UTC+5:30, Stuart Sierra wrote: > > From the look of the source, there's no reason why ->> couldn't have > arity-1. I guess it just doesn't come up much. >
Arity-1 for ->> would be useful to let somebody comment out forms as follows: (->> foo #_(bar baz) #_quux) I can file an issue on JIRA if this makes sense. Shantanu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
