On Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:27:15 PM UTC-7, Shantanu Kumar wrote: > > > > On Monday, 8 October 2012 04:57:06 UTC+5:30, Stuart Sierra wrote: >> >> From the look of the source, there's no reason why ->> couldn't have >> arity-1. I guess it just doesn't come up much. >> > > Arity-1 for ->> would be useful to let somebody comment out forms as > follows: > > (->> foo > #_(bar baz) > #_quux) > > I can file an issue on JIRA if this makes sense. >
+1 I've hit this issue before when generating a macroexpansion with ->> in it. Also, I think at some point -> and ->> weren't themselves properly namespaced in their own macroexpansions, not sure if it's still an issue but maybe worth checking while you're in there. > Shantanu > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
