Great! Congratulation. You improved it a lot. This should do good to stencil users, the code runs much faster now.
I did not implement the "Set Delimiter" and "lambdas" and "Dotted Names", etc. You implemented the whole SPEC, this should be point out. For a little background why I implemented Mustache.clj<https://github.com/shenfeng/mustache.clj> : I was doing https://github.com/shenfeng/rssminer ,the way I generate HTML is slow. I love Mustache, it's great. I rewrite it using Mustache by using the Clojure implention list here: http://mustache.github.com/. The performance did not improve much. *Without further reseach to find another one*, I write a Mustache implementation for myself to reduce the latency of Rssminer. On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:11 AM, David Santiago <david.santi...@gmail.com>wrote: > Just wanted to stop by and update this thread with the latest > information. I just released Stencil 0.3, at > http://github.com/davidsantiago/stencil and it contains many > performance improvements. I have pushed the benchmarks I use to test > it, including an adaptation of yours, to > http://github.com/davidsantiago/mustachequerade; the readme has an > example run. Performance of course depends on the templates and data, > but 0.3 ranges from nearly as fast as your mustache to 2x the runtime. > > In particular, for the benchmark you posted, I now get runtimes for a > single template render of 13us in mustache.clj vs. 25us in Stencil. > I'm not satisfied with those numbers, and will continue to push them > lower in future versions, but the 10x difference in runtime is clearly > no longer the case. > > David > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Shen, Feng <shen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, you are right. Stencil did a very good job. > > I only implement a subset. Test code . "Set Delimiter" and "lambdas" > and > > "Dotted Names" are not implemented. > > > > The algorithm of this implementation is borrowed from Mustache.js. > > I read the code, It's brilliant. > > > > I'v used Mustache in several projects. I like it. It's simple and > brilliant. > > "Set Delimiter" and "lambdas" are never used. This is why they are not > > implemented currently. I will implement the whole Spec when I find the > time. > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Anthony Grimes <disciplera...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > >> > >> Stencil is spec compliant (the tests actually run against the spec) > while > >> this implementation is not. A major goal behind stencil is to be totally > >> spec compliant and as fast as possible. However, implementing the slow > parts > >> of the spec is important too. > >> > >> > >> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 6:28:23 PM UTC-5, Feng Shen wrote: > >>> > >>> From http://mustache.github.com/, I only notice clostache, which is a > >>> little slow. > >>> I have not noticed stencil, if I do, probability, I will not do one > >>> myself. It's pretty fast. > >>> My implementation seems faster than stencil, in a test run, up to 10x. > >>> Test code: > >>> > https://github.com/shenfeng/mustache.clj/blob/master/test/me/shenfeng/perf_bench.clj > >>> It seems stencil is more feature rich than mine. For example, I did > not > >>> implement "Set Delimiter". > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 9:45:51 PM UTC+8, Baishampayan Ghose wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > I did yet another {{mustache}} implementation for Clojure > >>>> > > >>>> > https://github.com/shenfeng/mustache.clj > >>>> > > >>>> > I did it because I need a faster one when I am doing Rssminer . And > I > >>>> > dit > >>>> > it. > >>>> > By the way, Rssminer is yet another RSS reader, but written in > >>>> > Clojure. > >>>> > > >>>> > Usage: > >>>> > > >>>> > [me.shenfeng/mustache "0.0.4"] > >>>> > > >>>> > (:use me.shenfeng.mustache) > >>>> > > >>>> > (deftemplate template "{{template}}") > >>>> > (to-html template {:you-data "data"}) ;; returns String > >>>> > > >>>> > Let me know if you have any ideas or questions. > >>>> > >>>> Shen, > >>>> > >>>> Very nice work. Have you benchmarked your mustache lib with stencil? > >>>> It would be an interesting comparison. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> BG > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Baishampayan Ghose > >>>> b.ghose at gmail.com > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> Groups "Clojure" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > >> your first post. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your > > first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
