Stencil is spec compliant (the tests actually run against the spec) while this implementation is not. A major goal behind stencil is to be totally spec compliant and as fast as possible. However, implementing the slow parts of the spec is important too.
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 6:28:23 PM UTC-5, Feng Shen wrote: > > From http://mustache.github.com/, I only notice clostache, which is a > little slow. > I have not noticed stencil, if I do, probability, I will not do one > myself. It's pretty fast. > My implementation seems faster than stencil, in a test run, up to 10x. > Test code: > https://github.com/shenfeng/mustache.clj/blob/master/test/me/shenfeng/perf_bench.clj > It seems stencil is more feature rich than mine. For example, I did not > implement "Set Delimiter". > > > On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 9:45:51 PM UTC+8, Baishampayan Ghose wrote: >> >> > I did yet another {{mustache}} implementation for Clojure >> > >> > https://github.com/shenfeng/mustache.clj >> > >> > I did it because I need a faster one when I am doing Rssminer . And I >> dit >> > it. >> > By the way, Rssminer is yet another RSS reader, but written in Clojure. >> > >> > Usage: >> > >> > [me.shenfeng/mustache "0.0.4"] >> > >> > (:use me.shenfeng.mustache) >> > >> > (deftemplate template "{{template}}") >> > (to-html template {:you-data "data"}) ;; returns String >> > >> > Let me know if you have any ideas or questions. >> >> Shen, >> >> Very nice work. Have you benchmarked your mustache lib with stencil? >> It would be an interesting comparison. >> >> Regards, >> BG >> >> -- >> Baishampayan Ghose >> b.ghose at gmail.com >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
