>From http://mustache.github.com/, I only notice clostache, which is a
little slow.
I have not noticed stencil, if I do, probability, I will not do one myself.
It's pretty fast.
My implementation seems faster than stencil, in a test run, up to 10x.
Test code:
https://github.com/shenfeng/mustache.clj/blob/master/test/me/shenfeng/perf_bench.clj
It seems stencil is more feature rich than mine. For example, I did not
implement "Set Delimiter".
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 9:45:51 PM UTC+8, Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
>
> > I did yet another {{mustache}} implementation for Clojure
> >
> > https://github.com/shenfeng/mustache.clj
> >
> > I did it because I need a faster one when I am doing Rssminer . And I
> dit
> > it.
> > By the way, Rssminer is yet another RSS reader, but written in Clojure.
> >
> > Usage:
> >
> > [me.shenfeng/mustache "0.0.4"]
> >
> > (:use me.shenfeng.mustache)
> >
> > (deftemplate template "{{template}}")
> > (to-html template {:you-data "data"}) ;; returns String
> >
> > Let me know if you have any ideas or questions.
>
> Shen,
>
> Very nice work. Have you benchmarked your mustache lib with stencil?
> It would be an interesting comparison.
>
> Regards,
> BG
>
> --
> Baishampayan Ghose
> b.ghose at gmail.com
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
