2011/7/25 Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> > Salut Laurent, > > Am 25.07.2011 um 18:54 schrieb Laurent PETIT: > > > And then goodbye statical analysis ... :-) > > I didn't say, that I think it's a good idea to do this. :) > > On the other hand I'm not afraid of dynamic analysis either. That's what > VimClojure does at the moment anyway. Static analysis is – in general – > confined to special cases known to the analyzer in the presence of macros. > In practice it's probably doable in a reasonable way. >
Certainly, ccw/eclipse also does dynamic analysis currently, but I still have the idea of using static analysis for when no REPL is started, for some kinds of refactorings, etc. In the end, I find it interesting to be able to reconcile the static & dynamic views, maybe eventually being able to say to the user: beware, you're looking at a function definition in a file that's more recent in the repl, would you like to update, etc. > > Cordialement > Meikel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
