Hi,
In larger Clojure projects with nested namespaces I've found there are
less namespace pollution issues if I avoid (ns... :use...) forms in
preference to (ns... :require...) forms. This approach sometimes
leads to namespace constructs like:
(ns myfuns
(:require
[foo.baz.a :as a]
[foo.baz.b :as b]
[foo.baz.c :as c...]))
Is there an idiomatic way of coalescing these :require clauses into
a :require "farm" that can be simply :require'd or is this the wrong
way to manage namespaces in Clojure projects?
Any advice much appreciated,
Stu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
