On Jul 21, 2011, at 2:31 AM, pmbauer wrote: > Something akin to the clj-nstools ns+ in clojure proper would sure make life > easier.
There's no way that `ns` and its constituent pieces are the last word in defining/managing codebase topologies, but they are a bit of a local maxima. ns+ looks nice (I'm surprised I haven't come across it so far), but I'm surprised that there haven't been more attempts to cut a "better ns" out there. As shown in the "hello world" example for ns+, it's trivial to augment or entirely replace ns, potentially with very different semantics for e.g. how namespaces map to files, what constitutes a "lib", etc. - Chas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
