Yes, as a heavy Emacs/SLIME user who does not work with Common Lisp any more, I'd rather have a Clojure-specific Emacs environment, especially something that can do more introspection of the JVM, e.g., look up JavaDocs and examine classes through reflection.
In my not-terribly-well-informed opinion, string-oriented protocols are easier to parse in string-oriented languages like Perl and Emacs Lisp, whereas byte-oriented protocols help avoid mixups with character encoding and line-endings. Pick your poison. -Stuart Sierra clojure.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
