Hi,
On 21 Mrz., 13:52, James Reeves <jree...@weavejester.com> wrote:
> Then use the Clojure read-string and pr-str functions to encode data.
Then we need a clear definition of the clojure syntax. Otherwise you
cannot build clients without read-string. By hard-coding this I'm not
free to encode things as I want. Eg. with the current nREPL I can do:
>>> (with-vim-output (generic-function-returning-a-map))
<<< "{ 'foo': 'bar', 'baz': 5 }"
Which I can just stuff into the eval of my vim. It is a priori not
clear, what a reasonable encoding is. The current nREPL approach
allows to choose an appropriate one by the user.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
