On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess I would need to be persuaded that either a) Slime/Swank is so > unassailably good that all IDEs should implement it or b) there are > inherent problems with nREPL and no IDEs should use it?
As a follow on, the "Why another REPL implementation?" section of https://github.com/clojure/tools.nrepl is good reading (and confirms my suspicions about non-Emacs IDEs and Slime/Swank). -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
