On Mar 19, 7:30 pm, Martin Blais <bl...@furius.ca> wrote:
> (*) Please note: I am aware that only Emacs supports the > Swank protocol right now but I don't see why other IDEs > couldn't support it too--it's just made up of LISP forms > after all; in other words, if someone wants to replace > the swank protocol by an equivalent one with a different > encoding I don't really see the point. Anyway, for this > discussion I'll assume emacs-rex is a suitable enough > protocol; in fact, I think it probably is, because it > has already proved itself with a large number of LISP > environments, it has "history". In any case, that's a > separate discussion. I think of emacs-rex as just "the > protocol" and that other IDEs could implement it to talk > with swank-clojure. One IDE that uses swank is CUSP, an Eclipse plugin for SBCL - see www.bitfauna.com/projects/cusp. It appears to have no activity since 2009, and was forked off to lispdef - see bitbucket.org/skolos/lispdev. That project also seems rather abandoned, or at least no activity for six months. Looking at the source could be helpful in trying to adapt swank. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
