Found it. See
https://github.com/hiredman/odds-and-ends/blob/8a84e6ddbad9d71f714ba16c3e1239633228a7eb/functional.clj#L94
On Nov 16, 10:06 am, Alan <a...@malloys.org> wrote:
> Ask on #clojure about this. Someone (hiredman, I think?) has a macro
> that rewrites code using some funky unicode characters. I can't find
> it at the moment, but it might be what you're looking for.
>
> On Nov 16, 9:51 am, "Eric Schulte" <schulte.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Just to follow up, I'm now using the following to pretty up Clojure code
> > in Emacs
>
> > #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> > ;; symbols for some overlong function names
> > (eval-after-load 'clojure-mode
> > '(font-lock-add-keywords
> > 'clojure-mode
> > (mapcar
> > (lambda (pair)
> > `(,(car pair)
> > (0 (progn (compose-region
> > (match-beginning 0) (match-end 0)
> > ,(cadr pair))
> > nil))))
> > `(("\\<fn\\>" ,(make-char 'greek-iso8859-7 107))
> > ("\\<comp\\>" ?∘)
> > ("\\<partial\\>" ?þ)
> > ("\\<complement\\>" ?¬)))))
> > #+end_src
>
> > I think the results look quite nice, a small example is attached
>
> > abbrev-function-names.png
> > 5KViewDownload
>
> > Best -- Eric
>
> > "Eric Schulte" <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes:
> > > Hi Paul,
>
> > > Thanks for sharing this. It seems like the best compromise between the
> > > desire to keep my code brief (at least to my eyes) without wanting to
> > > introduce my own custom function names for global functions.
>
> > > If you don't mind I'd like to add this to my fork of the Emacs Starter
> > > Kit (will credit you as author).
>
> > > Best -- Eric
>
> > > Paul Hobbs <paul.mcdill.ho...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > >> Well, for those who use emacs, you could always make it *look* like it
> > >> was
> > >> pretty... For example:
>
> > >> (eval-after-load 'clojure-mode
> > >> '(font-lock-add-keywords
> > >> 'clojure-mode `(("\\<fn\\>"
> > >> (0 (progn (compose-region
> > >> (match-beginning 0) (match-end 0)
> > >> ,(make-char 'greek-iso8859-7 107)) ;; a lambda
> > >> nil)))
> > >> ("\\<comp\\>"
> > >> (0
> > >> (progn (compose-region
> > >> (match-beginning 0) (match-end 0)
> > >> "∘ ")
> > >> nil)))
> > >> ("\\<partial\\>"
> > >> (0
> > >> (progn (compose-region
> > >> (match-beginning 0) (match-end 0)
> > >> "𝒫 ")))))))
>
> > >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Cyrus Harmon <cyrushar...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >>> I think the minimal character count for composition and partial
> > >>> functions
> > >>> in haskell are some of the reasons that haskell code is so impenetrable
> > >>> to
> > >>> non-haskell hackers. Feel free to rig up crazy unicode characters to any
> > >>> identifier you want in your own code, just don't ask me to read or
> > >>> debug any
> > >>> of it.
>
> > >>> On Nov 15, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Paul Hobbs wrote:
>
> > >>> Coming from Haskell, where composition and partial functions are cheap
> > >>> and
> > >>> free in terms of character count, it is actually pretty discouraging to
> > >>> have
> > >>> to spell it out in Clojure for the same effect. Some of the cases
> > >>> where you
> > >>> "should" be using multiple expressions in Clojure would be perfectly
> > >>> clear
> > >>> in Haskell as one expression...
>
> > >>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Sean Corfield
> > >>> <seancorfi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > >>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Alan <a...@malloys.org> wrote:
> > >>>> > The one that bugs me is complement - such a long name for a commonly-
> > >>>> > useful function. I often wind up defining ! as an alias for
> > >>>> > complement, but maybe others will think that is poor style.
>
> > >>>> Possibly because bang functions indicate "Here be dragons" in terms of
> > >>>> mutating state? e.g., set!
>
> > >>>> Are you really using complement a lot? I guess I would define an alias
> > >>>> for the complement-ed function or use not in expressions...
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
> > >>>> Railo Technologies, Inc. --http://getrailo.com/
> > >>>> An Architect's View --http://corfield.org/
>
> > >>>> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> > >>>> -- Margaret Atwood
>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
> > >>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > >>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> > >>>> your first post.
> > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> > >>> --
> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >>> Groups "Clojure" group.
> > >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> > >>> your first post.
> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> > >>> --
> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >>> Groups "Clojure" group.
> > >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> > >>> your first post.
> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
