Yep, you have to use flip and it is not so elegant Prelude> let f x y z=(x+z)*y Prelude> map (flip (f 1) 2) [3,4,5] [9,12,15]
OTOH in clojure we have, you guess..., macros!!! user> (->> [[2 3][3 3][6 6]] (filter (comp even? sum)) concat2 (map #(+ 5 %))) (8 8 11 11) i promise i'll not comment about (superficial) syntax in a month!! :-P On Nov 16, 11:35 am, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 16 Nov., 11:06, atreyu <atreyu....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > clojure is nice too for the example but if you'd add functions and > > they have arity more than 1 haskell gets better (imo of course): > > And less than 3 if one is honest. Haskell is spicked with rather > unmotivated "`foo` x"s which simply means #(foo % x) in a - IMHO - > rather unobvious way. Do #(foo x % y) in Haskell... I'm missing the > elegance somehow. In the end this is only superficial and does not > affect the power of the underlying language in any way. > > Sincerely > Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
