Well, for those who use emacs, you could always make it *look* like it was
pretty... For example:
(eval-after-load 'clojure-mode
'(font-lock-add-keywords
'clojure-mode `(("\\<fn\\>"
(0 (progn (compose-region
(match-beginning 0) (match-end 0)
,(make-char 'greek-iso8859-7 107)) ;; a lambda
nil)))
("\\<comp\\>"
(0
(progn (compose-region
(match-beginning 0) (match-end 0)
"∘ ")
nil)))
("\\<partial\\>"
(0
(progn (compose-region
(match-beginning 0) (match-end 0)
"𝒫 ")))))))
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Cyrus Harmon <cyrushar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think the minimal character count for composition and partial functions
> in haskell are some of the reasons that haskell code is so impenetrable to
> non-haskell hackers. Feel free to rig up crazy unicode characters to any
> identifier you want in your own code, just don't ask me to read or debug any
> of it.
>
> On Nov 15, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Paul Hobbs wrote:
>
> Coming from Haskell, where composition and partial functions are cheap and
> free in terms of character count, it is actually pretty discouraging to have
> to spell it out in Clojure for the same effect. Some of the cases where you
> "should" be using multiple expressions in Clojure would be perfectly clear
> in Haskell as one expression...
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Alan <a...@malloys.org> wrote:
>> > The one that bugs me is complement - such a long name for a commonly-
>> > useful function. I often wind up defining ! as an alias for
>> > complement, but maybe others will think that is poor style.
>>
>> Possibly because bang functions indicate "Here be dragons" in terms of
>> mutating state? e.g., set!
>>
>> Are you really using complement a lot? I guess I would define an alias
>> for the complement-ed function or use not in expressions...
>> --
>> Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
>> Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/
>> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
>>
>> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
>> -- Margaret Atwood
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
