Hi, On 16 Nov., 11:06, atreyu <atreyu....@gmail.com> wrote:
> clojure is nice too for the example but if you'd add functions and > they have arity more than 1 haskell gets better (imo of course): And less than 3 if one is honest. Haskell is spicked with rather unmotivated "`foo` x"s which simply means #(foo % x) in a - IMHO - rather unobvious way. Do #(foo x % y) in Haskell... I'm missing the elegance somehow. In the end this is only superficial and does not affect the power of the underlying language in any way. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
