On 8 July 2010 16:56, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote: > Clojars is a disaster as an authoritative software artifact repository IMO, > and nothing about how it's being used should be taken as a template for > anything else.
Ruby and Rubygems has been using single-segment namespaces for years, with no major problems. I don't think name clashes are a problem in practise, because projects tend to have original names. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
