Hi, 2010/7/7 James Reeves <[email protected]>: > I've kinda asked this question before, but I framed in the context of > a suggestion, and the discussion got bogged down with no real answer. > > So this time, let me keep it simple: if I have a small Clojure > library, "foo", which only has one namespace, what is the idiomatic > name for that namespace? > > - foo > - foo.foo > - foo.core > - com.github.weavejester.foo > > I don't intend to call "foo" from Java, so there is no genclass in the > namespace definition, and I do not intend to AOT compile the > namespace.
I would say: if this library is only for you, and you don't intend to share it -ever-, then "foo" for the namespace is good. if you intend to share the library, then use the classical prefix notation: * either of the form net.reeves.james.foo ( or any reversed tld you "own" ) * either of the form com.yourcorp.foo Of course, if your library has an especially cryptic name (as we have with counterclockwise: ccw), then having also directly foo may also not interfere with other's namespaces. That's the path we took for counterclockwise, and our top-level namespace/package is just 'ccw' My 0.02 €, -- Laurent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
