On 7 July 2010 17:24, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Of course, if your library has an especially cryptic name (as we have > with counterclockwise: ccw), then having also directly foo may also > not interfere with other's namespaces. That's the path we took for > counterclockwise, and our top-level namespace/package is just 'ccw'
For the purposes of this discussion, let us assume that "foo" is a suitably unique library name, and it is highly unlikely there exist any other libraries with the same name. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
