Well, by claiming that clojure is fast, you are making an invitation for people to try it and see. If they report otherwise and back it up, that should be ok. I'm not sure if that's the case, here, but I, for one, have a concern that if we're only aloud to say nice things in here, then people only see one side of things. I almost NEVER see what people DON'T like about clojure ... or like better about other languages. Those things could be constructive, too. I seem to remember warnings about such ... and did I see something about "trolling" being discouraged? I had to look it up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
the definition didn't really help because it's not always clear what topics are "off" . . .and what should be forbidden or taboo. Sometimes *that* is where answers are found, too. On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote: > > fft1976 <fft1...@gmail.com> writes: > > > P.S. The moderators (Chouser) are now censoring my posts, so if you > > don't see this message on the list as well, I wrote something they are > > trying to suppress. > > The question you're avoiding is if they're suppressing you because > you're too "edgy" or just because you're confrontational and annoying. > > You're doing a pretty good job of convincing us it's the latter. > > -Phil > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
