On Jun 25, 8:39 am, Berlin Brown <berlin.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is my main point: One thing that Clojure is NOT. It is not
> limited by the limitations of the Java programming language.
>
It may not be limited by the java _language_, but it is limited by the
java _platform_.
Given the OP's question about academic vs practical: to my mind, a
practical language implies standalone scripts and easy library
management. Having to launch a JVM + dealing with classpath
nightmares are antithetical to that. When something as academic as
haskell is more practical on those dimensions than the language you're
considering . . .
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
