On Jan 13, 4:30 am, Mark P <pierh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 5:49 pm, Zak Wilson <zak.wil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You're probably thinking of
> > this:http://www.flownet.com/gat/papers/lisp-java.pdf
>
> Thanks for the link.
>
> > There's also the (in)famous language benchmark
> > site:http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/
>
> This is primarily what I was going on. I realize no
> benchmarking approach is going to be perfect, but
> this attempt doesn't seem too bad. Is there any
> reason to be particularly sceptical about results
> found here?
>
> Oh, and I realize my comments about SBCL lisp being
> 3 to 4 times slower than C++ only apply for the quad
> core machines.
Notice which programs are using more than one core and which aren't.
> The single core machines have SBCL
> as 2.2 or 2.3 times slower than C++. Perhaps this
> is a truer representation of SBCL's "raw capabilities".
>
> But a 120% performance hit is still quite a whack.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark P.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
