On Jan 6, 11:54 am, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Code like @*foo* is not something I've seen in any code Rich has
> > written, so I think Stuart is right in considering removing the
> > asterisks on *apple* and *snake*
>
> I plan to remove them. What I still wrestle with is using "snake" at
> the top level as ref, and then having a bunch of pure functions that
> shadow the top level snake with a binding to an immutable snake data
> structure.
>
Might I suggest then that you do away with the globals snake and apple
altogether?
The result will be a much cleaner program.
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
