> Code like @*foo* is not something I've seen in any code Rich has > written, so I think Stuart is right in considering removing the > asterisks on *apple* and *snake*
I plan to remove them. What I still wrestle with is using "snake" at the top level as ref, and then having a bunch of pure functions that shadow the top level snake with a binding to an immutable snake data structure. I think a naming convention for refs would be more valuable than a naming convention for constants. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
