Török Edwin wrote:
On 2011-03-11 15:14, Peter Bonivart wrote:
...
I also looked at a couple of servers where the hardware is 3-4 years
old and they took 5-7 seconds to reload. But they have a high load
from all mail related services they do, probably they could shave off
a second or two if tested separately.
Hmm, Martin Preen has quite a few 3rdparty DBs (in clamconf output),
maybe those cause the load-time slowdown?
Is it any faster without them?
Yup, thats it. Without these ndb files and on this old HW
the reload time goes from approx 90 sec to approx 35 sec.
Obvoiusly I have to avoid some of them. It seems that scamnailer.ndb
and spear[l].ndb are the ones which hurts most.
With or without bytecode.cvd doesn't make a difference.
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Preen, Universität Freiburg, Institut für Informatik
Georges-Koehler-Allee 52, Raum EG-006, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
phone: ++49 761 203-8250 pr...@informatik.uni-freiburg.de
fax: ++49 761 203-8242 www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
