On 2011-03-11 15:14, Peter Bonivart wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:03 PM, aCaB <aca...@digitalfuture.it> wrote: >> On 03/10/11 20:58, Peter Bonivart wrote: >>> You could give our ClamAV package a try: >>> >>> http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWclamav/ >> >> Guys, >> Anybody tried? >> >> I'd be very interested in hearing the results. > > I have obviously tried my own packages ;) and if timestamps from > clamd.log are to be trusted it's 3 seconds every time: > > Thu Mar 10 11:16:42 2011 -> Reading databases from /var/opt/csw/clamav/db > Thu Mar 10 11:16:45 2011 -> Database correctly reloaded (915866 signatures) > > Thu Mar 10 15:21:45 2011 -> Reading databases from /var/opt/csw/clamav/db > Thu Mar 10 15:21:48 2011 -> Database correctly reloaded (915861 signatures) > > Thu Mar 10 17:45:25 2011 -> Reading databases from /var/opt/csw/clamav/db > Thu Mar 10 17:45:28 2011 -> Database correctly reloaded (915985 signatures) > > Thu Mar 10 21:46:11 2011 -> Reading databases from /var/opt/csw/clamav/db > Thu Mar 10 21:46:14 2011 -> Database correctly reloaded (916108 signatures) > > Fri Mar 11 03:24:49 2011 -> Reading databases from /var/opt/csw/clamav/db > Fri Mar 11 03:24:52 2011 -> Database correctly reloaded (916124 signatures) > > I also looked at a couple of servers where the hardware is 3-4 years > old and they took 5-7 seconds to reload. But they have a high load > from all mail related services they do, probably they could shave off > a second or two if tested separately.
Hmm, Martin Preen has quite a few 3rdparty DBs (in clamconf output), maybe those cause the load-time slowdown? Is it any faster without them? --Edwin _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
