Quoting "Aecio F. Neto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I don't agree with that, but let me put another option: > 1) Break on unknown options > 2) Ignore obsolete options and warn OP
Valid in many cases... > If any Op (or poor user) adds an option like > PleaseClamAVCleanInfectedFilesForMe yes > and expects it to work, are you really sure that the software should not > ignore this? Yes. What happens if he means to type "ScanRAR" but makes a typo and enters "ScnaRAR". If it ignores the entry, then the RAR isn't scanned according to their wishes/desires. That is, the software acts in a way that isn't expected. > I see no difference from mine example to yours, because one should > understand at minimum which options are availble before adding one he > *thinks* exists. What about a simple typo? -- Eric Rostetter The Department of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Go Longhorns! _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
