Charles Gregory wrote: > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, David F. Skoll wrote: >> That's not Clam's fault. On our product, if Clam dies, then mail is >> tempfailed.
> I suppose you have 24/7 tech support. We go home on weekends. I don't need > to tempfail all mail until Monday for a config deprecation. So with > respect, this is one case where ClamAV should *not* die.... Well, I agree. ClamAV should *not* die. But, if it does die, then mail should *not* be delivered un-scanned. However, this is a policy decision, so I guess we can agree to disagree. :-) Regards, David. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
