-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Holdoway wrote: | Having just been spending quite some time writing .spec files, it could be because rpm -U actually runs the uninstall script of the superseeded package ( with $1 set to a different value to if you're running -e ) as a part of the upgrade. | | It's most confusing and the logic of it offers only lip service to sanity! | | Steve No. I built the RPMs on a system with 0.92.1 installed and running. The resulting RPMs had a dependency on clamav requiring libclamunrar_iface.so.3 instead of the packaged so.4 file... ?? To fix the dependency, I had to 'rpm -e clamav clamav-devel clamav-milter' ... then rebuild the RPMs from the source for 0.93. Then install the resulting RPMs with -i ...
PS: I did not use -U but -F to try the upgrade when it failed due to the dependency on the old library package. James -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkgFDcUACgkQkNLDmnu1kSkc8wCcDG0Nc0KTn+33lXSmqkp1YpQA 2iQAnR9lDqWlV3LmAEQ3HBgYntqalDu7 =htqY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
