On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 11:26:44 +0100 Stephan von Krawczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Clamscan and clamdscan are two different things. > > That is exactly what I wanted to express. But as far as I understand the > design > the idea is that clamdscan can equally replace clamscan, apart from the fact > that the real scanning is done by a daemon in the background. > So shouldn't all options work just the same? clamdoc.pdf, 5.2 -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Sat Nov 5 12:50:39 CET 2005
pgpXYlRhpbvrR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
