On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 12:53:11 +0100 Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 11:26:44 +0100 > Stephan von Krawczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Clamscan and clamdscan are two different things. > > > > That is exactly what I wanted to express. But as far as I understand the > > design the idea is that clamdscan can equally replace clamscan, apart from > > the fact that the real scanning is done by a daemon in the background. > > So shouldn't all options work just the same? > > clamdoc.pdf, 5.2 Is there a chance for external unpackers? Besides the RAR-problem the combination of clamd/clamdscan is doing really well. -- Regards, Stephan _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
