On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 11:26:44 +0100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stephan von Krawczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Clamscan and clamdscan are two different things. > > That is exactly what I wanted to express. But as far as I understand > the design the idea is that clamdscan can equally replace clamscan, > apart from the fact that the real scanning is done by a daemon in the > background. So shouldn't all options work just the same? > Not all of them, there are inevitably differences due to the design of the process. Have a look at the man pages to see what is the same and what isn't. -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
