On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:01:33 +0000 Matt Fretwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > 04/11/2005 14:17:07:26333: run /usr/local/bin/clamdscan -r > > --tempdir=/var/spool/qmailscan/mail-a02113111022758026333 > > --disable-summary --unzip --unrar --unace --unarj --zoo --lha --jar > > --tar --tgz /var/spool/qmailscan/mail-a02113111022758026333 2>&1 > > 04/11/2005 14:17:07:26333: --output of clamscan was: WARNING: > > Ignoring option -r: please edit clamd.conf instead. > > > Clamscan and clamdscan are two different things. That is exactly what I wanted to express. But as far as I understand the design the idea is that clamdscan can equally replace clamscan, apart from the fact that the real scanning is done by a daemon in the background. So shouldn't all options work just the same? -- Regards, Stephan _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
