Matt Fretwell said: > Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> If they were running their systems properly we wouldn't be having this >> conversation. The clients of those systems are able to retrieve mail and >> attachments straight to local storage while by-passing local filters >> (and policy). Not very different from browsing ftp sites in that regard, >> and wholly unsecure. > > > Which again brings us back to the point that Timo pointed out. Proxying. > > If your local security isn't upto scratch, you cannot blame someone else. > Period. Ingress is ingress, whichever path it takes. > > > Matt
Very true - but policy is far less expensive than new hardware, and there are no licensing fees. I'd have to see the business reason to go there. dp _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html