Julian Mehnle wrote:
Dennis Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Besides, if mail servers started using SPF (or similar authentication techniques) to verify envelope sender addresses, whoever publishes SPF records for his domains would be
Not to start another flame war, but I find it interesting that you take such a hard-nosed approach to what is and is not technically a virus,
Am I? I'm just saying that I think that a distinction between technical attacks and social engineering attacks is possible and meaningful (even if not everyone would make use of that distinction). That has nothing to do with being hard-nosed, has it?
I hate to butt into a discussion, but I would have to agree. I use SpamAssassin and ClamAV, I don't need or want them doing the same job. I've seen this same discussion on the SpamAssassin list where users wanted rules to stop Viruses with SA, and the general reponse was "No, SA is a spam filter, get ClamAV if you want to stop Viruses"
DAve
-- Systems Administrator http://www.tls.net Get rid of Unwanted Emails...get TLS Spam Blocker!
_______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
