Hanford, Seth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I agree with Julian that Clam does not seem the logical solution to Spam > messages.
Please note that I have never talked about ClamAV unwantedly detecting _spam_. I just talked about social engineering in general and about phishing in particular. _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
