On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 16:39, Dave Goodrich wrote: > Julian Mehnle wrote: > > > > Am I? I'm just saying that I think that a distinction between technical > > attacks and social engineering attacks is possible and meaningful (even if > > not everyone would make use of that distinction). That has nothing to do > > with being hard-nosed, has it? > > I hate to butt into a discussion, but I would have to agree. I use > SpamAssassin and ClamAV, I don't need or want them doing the same job. > I've seen this same discussion on the SpamAssassin list where users > wanted rules to stop Viruses with SA, and the general reponse was "No, > SA is a spam filter, get ClamAV if you want to stop Viruses"
Please give a full definition of Spam and Malware/Viruses that do not intersect, and will never intersect for all future Spam and Malware such that we can be sure we know what you are requesting. Not one of the Clam developers have proposed adding general spam detection to ClamAV. -trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
