On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 17:40, Damian Menscher wrote: > There are three cases to consider: > > 1 - virus from infected machine > 2 - virus relayed through another server > 3 - false positive > > Everyone agrees we don't want to generate a notification for case 1. > Everyone agrees we *do* want to generate a notification for case 3. > > The *only* way to pull this off, is to *reject* viruses. Yes, this > allows for a few false notifications (case 2) but those are fairly rare.
...and are not your problem. You just closed the SMTP session with an error. If the relaying host generates a bounce to the wrong person, it is their problem. -- Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
