On 11/Oct/18 16:30, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> > James, > > I think the difference Mark may have in mind that iBGP routes say from > RR are advertised from RR's control plane. Many RRs today are just x86 > control plane boxes with no forwarding. > > On the other hand number of implementations before sending route over > eBGP must make sure that those routes are installed in data plane > locally before being advertised. > > Of course non of this really matters if those routes are already > installed when you trigger advertisements to UUT. > > There are also few more little "delays" for eBGP vs iBGP depending on > your BGP code base - regarding policy processing or origin validation :). Yes, all the above :-). Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
