Nicolas covered the RIB speed in the blog as well, and had varying results, but on average about 10s for today's full table. The bottleneck in the operation is usually the advertising router, not the local router populating the RIB. I don't think there was a test where the FIB took more than 30 seconds.
Thanks, Phil On 10/5/18, 3:26 AM, "cisco-nsp on behalf of Mark Tinka" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: On 5/Oct/18 09:17, Robert Hass wrote: > Hi > I'm looking for share experiences regarding time needed to program full DFZ > table (710K IPv4 prefixes) on NCS 5500 boxes. > > Right now we testing competitors (Jericho based boxes) and results are not > impressive - time needed to program is aroud 2min 30sec up to 3min. > > How fast NCS 5500 is handing FIB programming ? I don't have any of these boxes (or chipsets) in my network, but out of curiosity, how long does it take to load the same routes in RIB, depending on if these are learned via iBGP (from a route reflector, likely) or via eBGP (from an upstream provider, for example)? Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
