> James Bensley > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 7:17 AM > > > > On 12 October 2018 02:14:03 BST, Tim Warnock <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > >Of > >> Robert Raszuk > >> So for educational purposes could you describe some real valid use > >cases to > >> apply bgp policies on routes *received* over IBGP ? > >> > >> Thx, > >> Robert. > > > >Setting local preference? > > > >Rewriting next hop? > > Yeah, stuff like remotely triggered black hole routing is often applied as in > inbound iBGP policy. > In order to avoid using ingress policy on iBGP session towards RRs I'm setting the dummy next-hop on export from the trigger VRF, but yes I had to add the dummy next-hop onto RRs for them to have a valid next-hop and could relay the route further.
adam netconsultings.com ::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry:: _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
