/128 for me too. On Thursday, 21 November 2013, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 21/11/13 08:38, CiscoNSP List wrote: > >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> What is "recommended" practice when configuring OSPFv3/IPv6 >> Loopbacks? Do you assign /128's or /64's - If /64's do you need to >> enable "ipv6 ospf network point-to-point" under the loopback so that >> the IPv6 address is advertised as a /64 and not as /128? >> > > We do /128 and there is no complex config beyond the ospf area: > > interface Loopback1 > ipv6 address 2001:db8:12::1/128 > ipv6 ospf 1 area 0 > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
