On Friday, May 20, 2011 05:12:44 PM Saku Ytti wrote: > What features do you mean specifically? As far as I know, > only difference MIC have is ability to do HQoS. And even > this I think is just software thing, can't see why the > chassis ports couldn't do HQoS too.
Lack of H-QoS in the MX80 fixed chassis is one problem, as well as SyncE + friends. Can't get into too much detail here, but it's all stuff your Juniper SE can tell you :-). We are researching new peering routers and found out (at the time) that hardware-based Netflow isn't supported in the MX80. I haven't checked since then, so not sure what the plan there is. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
