On Fri, 20 May 2011, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Difficult to understand why an MS-DPC is required for jflow v9. The
additional overhead of netflowv9 is very low, and the actual cost of running
an MS-DPC can be quite high (i.e. extra slot which would otherwise be used
for a traffic blade).
"Revenue Assurance" ;)
Having just looked into this recently, the options appear to be either:
1. MS-DPC + Jflow license for v5/v9 data export
2. No MS-DPC, but a different Jflow license for v10-only data export
On one side, you have an expensive card + a license. On the other side,
you have just an expensive license.
Of course, this is probably starting to stray a bit off-topic for
cisco-nsp, too. Cisco gets you, but Netflow doesn't appear to be a
priority for their Revenue Assurance department :)
jms
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
