> Difficult to understand why an MS-DPC is required for jflow v9. The > additional overhead of netflowv9 is very low, and the actual cost of > running an MS-DPC can be quite high (i.e. extra slot which would otherwise > be used for a traffic blade).
Money? :-) Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
