Hi, On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:20:14PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Juniper are still pushing the "here's the hardware, but if you actually > want to use it, we're going to gouge you for more" model for netflow. > Thankfully, Cisco aren't doing this on any of their platforms.
Have they abandoned that? $Earlier versions of IOS on 7200s required a
(pricey!) netflow license.
... and I wouldn't be surprised to see extra licenses for netflow on
the ES line cards and for $anythingonCRS1...
From what we hear from colleagues that got CRS1, Cisco is fully back in
"need extra licenses for anything!" land now - *plus* "the hardware
enforces licenses" *and* "their license management is seriously fubared"
(this is how the story goes: power outage, CRS-1 came back without any
valid licenses, took TAC a week to restore licenses). Well, colleagues
have learned, and will never ever buy anything again that requires
licenses to be stored on the device...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpC5BsMoVdAP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
