================
@@ -51,14 +51,15 @@ DefaultTemplateArgumentContainsUnexpandedPack(const 
TemplateParam &P) {
          
P.getDefaultArgument().getArgument().containsUnexpandedParameterPack();
 }
 
-TemplateParameterList::TemplateParameterList(const ASTContext& C,
+TemplateParameterList::TemplateParameterList(const ASTContext &C,
                                              SourceLocation TemplateLoc,
                                              SourceLocation LAngleLoc,
                                              ArrayRef<NamedDecl *> Params,
                                              SourceLocation RAngleLoc,
                                              Expr *RequiresClause)
-    : TemplateLoc(TemplateLoc), LAngleLoc(LAngleLoc), RAngleLoc(RAngleLoc),
-      NumParams(Params.size()), ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack(false),
+    : InjectedArgs(&C), TemplateLoc(TemplateLoc), LAngleLoc(LAngleLoc),
----------------
sdkrystian wrote:

> Is it REALLY troublesome/not really possible, or is it just a code change?

Fixing existing code should be trivial, I just really dislike "getters" with 
parameters :P Ultimately, the "right thing" here is very subjective... but I'll 
cherry-pick 
[3fd8326](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3fd8326e222877bce474010481a459b5db0c8be2)
 onto this branch & merge, absent any objections

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113579
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to